| The appellant is an industrial consumer having consumer number 6662 under Electrical Section, Pulamanthole in Malappuram District. The appellant has requested enhancement of his connected load to 71 kW and accordingly capacity of existing transformer enhanced to 160 kVA after sanctioning OYEC instalment scheme. He had remitted 10% of the transformer cost amounting to Rs. 43,390.00 and the balance was being levied from him on monthly basis. According to the appellant he had remitted an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs approximately towards the cost of transformer in excess of the actual expenditure incurred for installation of transformer. Hence the appellant preferred a petition before the CGRF with a plea to refund the excess amount remitted which was not allowed by the Forum in its order OP No.106/2015-16 dated 02-03-2016. Against the above order of CGRF, the appellant has filed this appeal petition before this Authority.
Though the appellant claimed that he remitted an amount of Rs. 3,00,000.00 approximately towards the charges for the enhancement of transformer, he failed to produce the remittance details such as copy of monthly bills issued and its remittances or any other documents to prove his arguments. Hence this Authority is not in a position to verify the genuineness of the argument put forward by the appellant. Since the appellant failed to produce any evidence to prove his claim of excess remittance, I do not find any reason to intervene in the matter at this stage
In view of the above it can be seen that the appellant submitted the appeal without furnishing any reason or explanation or even without any documents to prove his argument of excess remittances. In this background the appeal petition is found not sustainable and hence dismissed. The order of CGRF in OP No. 106/2015-16 dated 02-03-2016 is upheld. No order as to costs. |
|
|
Data
|
| Size |
164.37 KB |
| Downloads |
1107 |
| Created |
2016-07-22 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
Overview
Search Downloads
Submit file
Up
P/023/2016 Sri. P. Yoosaf, Palakkad. 