| The review petitioner, the Assistant Executive Engineer, KSE Board Ltd, Electrical Sub Division, Punalur has filed this review petition against the orders issued by this Authority in appeal petition No. P/026/2016 dated 20-07-2016. The grievance of the appellant in the above appeal petition is that the licensee has erected an electric post in his property without his consent and hence he approached the licensee for shifting the same. But the licensee directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs. 6,766.00 towards the labour charges for shifting the electric post. Instead of remitting the amount the appellant approached CGRF, (Kottarakkara) with a complaint and the Forum disposed of the petition vide order in OP No. 1657/2015 dated 11-03-2016. Aggrieved against the order of CGRF, the review respondent has submitted an appeal petition before this Authority which is serially numbered as P/026/2016. The appeal petition was disposed of having allowed the plea of the appellant to the extent as it was ordered. Now the review petitioner has submitted that a factual error occurred in the order No. P/026/2016 dated 20-07-2016 issued by this Authority and therefore requested to review the order and to dismiss the said appeal petition.
This Authority has analyzed all the facts and circumstances of the case before taking the decision and held to shift the electric post erected without the consent of the review respondent. Also it is directed the review petitioner to shift the line drawn without maintaining statutory clearances with due consideration of safety aspects. The review petitioner had not raised any of these points or aspects which are not brought to the notice of this Authority before arriving at the decisions sought to be reviewed. The review jurisdiction is limited to rectify a mistake or error which is apparent on the face of records and it cannot be used appellate jurisdiction. The arguments now raised cannot be considered for a review as it was considered, decided and order issued accordingly. Hence there is no cause of sufficient reason established by the review petitioner for a review of the order already issued.
In view of the above discussions I hold that the review petition is not maintainable and hence rejected. |
|
|
Data
|
| Size |
146.92 KB |
| Downloads |
1174 |
| Created |
2016-08-26 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
Overview
Search Downloads
Submit file
Up
REVIEW PETITION No. P/026/2016 The Assistant Executive Engineer, Punalur. 