| The appellant, Sri Damodaran K., is a commercial consumer with consumer number 1750 under Electrical Section, Puthenchantha. The grievance of the appellant is that a nearby building owner of Swapna Lodge erected a name board and an insulated wire was drawn through the outer wall of the appellant’s building for lighting the name board. As appellant’s building is more than 50 years old, the wall of the building caused crack and damage due to clamping of insulated wire with PVC pipes. So, the appellant requested to remove the said wiring, but the owner of the nearby building denied his request. Then the appellant filed a petition before the Assistant Engineer who is also failed to take any action on his request. Aggrieved against the inaction of the Assistant Engineer, the appellant filed petition before the CGRF, Kottarakkara which was dismissed due to lack of merits, vide order OP No. 89/2016 dated 12-08-2016 and hence the appellant preferred this appeal before this Authority.
When the matter was taken up for disposal on 20-12-2016, the appellant was present and on the respondent’s side Smt. T.V. Asa was also present.
The appellant submitted that his grievance was redressed since the insulated wire drawn through the outer wall of appellant’s building for lighting up the name board for Swapna Lodge was removed. This fact was also reiterated by the respondent. So, there is no need for any further adjudication of the issue. The only apprehension of the appellant was that there may not be any drawing of insulated wire through the outer wall of the appellant’s building by the said nearby owner of Swapna Lodge. The respondent assured that periodical surveillance will be done by the officials of the respondent in this regard. The respondent is also directed to take proper action if any violations of the rules and provisions in the Electricity Act and Supply Code by the parties concerned. Anyway, in view of the fact that the matter is settled I am not going into the merits of the rival contentions raised in the appeal.
In the above circumstances the appeal is disposed of as above. The order OP No. 89/2016 dated 12-08-2016 is set aside. No order as to costs. |
|
|
Data
|
| Size |
142.63 KB |
| Downloads |
1153 |
| Created |
2017-02-08 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
Overview
Search Downloads
Submit file
Up
P/065/2016 Sri. Damodaran K Thiruvananthapuram. 