| The appellant, Sri P.V. Mathew, is a consumer under Electrical Section, Thrikodithanam. The appellant’s case is against the non removal of electric line drawn through his property for providing service connection to three houses. It is alleged that the line was drawn through his property without his knowledge and consent. Against the above action on the part of respondent, the appellant approached the Hon’ble Commission which was disposed of with a direction to file a petition before CGRF. Accordingly, the appellant filed a petition before the CGRF, Kottarakkara and the Forum is of the opinion that further interruption is not required until the disposal of OP filed by the appellant in the Munsiff Court, Changanacherry and the Forum dismissed the petition vide order in OP No. 160/2016 dated 19-10-2016. Feeling aggrieved against the order of CGRF, the appellant has filed the appeal petition before this Authority.
In view of the above discussion the appellant is directed to submit an application for shifting the overhead line in the local office of the licensee. The respondent is directed to shift the overhead line passing through the appellant’s property after giving supply to the existing consumers by alternative methods. It is made clear that labour charges required for shifting the overhead line only be recovered from the appellant after giving prior intimation of the estimate.
The order of CGRF in OP No. 160/2016 dated 19-10-2016 is set aside. No order as to costs. |
|
|
Data
|
| Size |
284.65 KB |
| Downloads |
1106 |
| Created |
2017-03-17 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
Overview
Search Downloads
Submit file
Up
P/089/2016 Sri. P.V. Mathew, Kottayam. 