Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Download details
REVIEW PETITION NO. RP/02/2019 IN APPEAL PETITION No. P/089/2018 - The Assistant Executive Engineer, Karunagappally South,
The review respondent/appellant is the Managing partner of the M.G. Roller Flour Mill, an SSI Unit conducting flour making unit. The inspecting authorities of TMR Thirumala conducted a field inspection in the review respondent’s/appellant's premises on 02.08.2017 and found that the PT Secondary RY and BY Voltages are low and hence the PT unit was suspected to be faulty and directed him to enhance the contract demand and to replace the PT unit with new PT of accuracy class 0.2 and to change CT with ratio 10/5 A to 15/5 A with accuracy Class 0.2S. The review petitioner has imposed penalty as 50% extra over the prevailing rate applicable both demand and energy for two months during which the appellant failed to replace the faulty metering component, and one month thereafter. The review respondent has challenged the penal bill before Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum in O.P. No. 94/2018 and the CGRF dismissed the petition vide order dated 05-11-2018. Aggrieved by the order of the CGRF, the review respondent/appellant has submitted appeal petition against the orders of CGRF which was admitted in appeal no. 89/2018 and disposed of the appeal by quashing the 50% extra imposed for three months over the prevailing rate applicable both demand and energy charge, vide order dated 27-02-2019. The review petitioner has filed this review petition against the orders of this Authority. In view of the above discussions the review jurisdiction is limited to rectify a mistake or error which is apparent on the face of records and it cannot be used as appellate jurisdiction. So, in view of the fact that the review petitioner has not pointed out anything which escaped the notice of this Authority while disposing the matter earlier, I hold the review petition is not maintainable and hence rejected.


Size 186.4 KB
Downloads 87
Created 2019-05-02 09:01:07