Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Download details
P/061/2023- Shri. Babu C George
The appellant is a consumer of the licensee (KSEBL) under Thrikkakkara Electrical Section. The appellant applied for the power supply to their new project BCG Residency opposite CEZ at Seaport Airport Road, Kakkanad, Ernakulam on 13/01/2013. The requirment of the power of the appellant was 900kVA along with three other applicant. The 11 kV line has to be drawn for a length of 1.8 km from the 66 kv substation, Kakkanad in which 1.65 km is a new line and 140 m of line duplication. The appellant has paid the proportional contribution for the work of Rs. 2,41,935/- The licensee has completed the works on 30/04/2013 and issued notice on 28/06/2013, to avail the power supply by 30/06/2013, if not the unconnected minimum charges will be levied at the rate of Rs.54,900/- per month. The appellant could avail the power supply as on 28/06/2015. As per the supply code 2005 regulation 10(1), the appellant is liable to pay the UCM charges. The supply code was revised and the same was come into force with effect from 01/04/2014, the UCM charges are not applicable as per the new supply code. Hence, the licensee charged the UCM charges from 01/07/2013 to 31/03/2014 (i.e., for 9 months) for Rs. 4,94,100/- The appellant contented this demand notice stating that this is not chargeable as per the Electricity Act 2003. They file petition to CGRF and CGRF issued order dated 18/10/2023 stating that the appellant is liable to pay the UCM charges for six months. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, this petition is filed to this authority.


Size 117.22 KB
Downloads 273
Created 2024-02-28 05:07:07