Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1327 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/124/2015 - Sri. Eldo Kuriakose, Muvattupuzha 
|
|
| The appellant is an agricultural consumer (LT V) with consumer No. 727 under Electrical Section No. 2, Muvattupuzha. On 03-02-2015, the APTS team of KSEB conducted an inspection in the premises of the appellant and it was found some irregularities in the classification of tariff. On 11-02-2015, the appellant was issued with a short assessment bill amounting to Rs. 4,567.00 under LT IV A tariff for the period from 5/2013 to 1/2015. The appellant has filed an appeal before the Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section No. 2. After conducting a hearing, the Assistant Engineer revised the bill amount to Rs. 2,107/- and disposed the petition. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Ernakulam by filing a Complaint No. 15/2015-16. The CGRF dismissed the petition vide order dated 27-05-2015 by holding that the short assessment bill is in order. Still aggrieved with the above decisions of CGRF, the appellant has approached this Authority with this appeal petition on 24-06-2015. Short assessment bill issued for Rs. 2,107.00 is set aside. Order of CGRF in OP No. 15/2015-16 dated 27-05-2015 is set aside. Appeal is admitted to the extent as ordered. |
| P/123/2015 - Smt. Smitha Peter, Muvattupuzha
|
|
| The appellant is an agricultural consumer (LT V) with consumer No. 514 under Electrical Section No. 2, Muvattupuzha. On 03-02-2015, the APTS team of KSEB conducted an inspection in the premises of the appellant and it was found some irregularities in the classification of tariff. On 11-02-2015, the appellant was issued with a short assessment bill amounting to Rs. 11,446.00 under LT IV A tariff for the period from 5/2013 to 1/2015. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Ernakulam by filing a Complaint No. 13/2015-16. The CGRF dismissed the petition vide order dated 27-05-2015 by holding that the short assessment bill is in order. Still aggrieved with the above decisions of CGRF, the appellant has approached this Authority with this appeal petition on 24-06-2015. The short assessment issued for a previous period from 05/2013 to 01/2015 is not sustainable and same is quashed. The respondent is directed to verify the predominant nature of the agricultural activity conducted in the appellant's premises and to revise the tariff accordingly. Order of CGRF in OP No. 13/2015-16 dated 20-07-2015 is set aside. Appeal is admitted to the extent as ordered. |
| P/117/2015 - Sri Madhusoodhanan Pillai, Keerikkadu
|
|
| The appellant and the members of 12 other families residing in the location had raised complaint regarding the obstruction for the free conveyance due to the existence of two electric posts on their private road. On 10-10-2014, Sri Chandran Pillai, a complainant, (Consumer no.4637) had submitted an application at Electrical Section, Kayamkulam West for shifting the above electric posts for the smooth running of vehicles through the road. Accordingly the respondent had prepared an estimate for carrying out the work and the same was done on 24-11-2014. According to the appellant, the work was not executed as requested by them and they were not satisfied with the action of the respondent. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Central Region, Ernakulam by filing a petition on 04-02-15. The CGRF admitted the petition and issued an order dated 29-04-2015 directing the respondents to shift the post (KYB/BP/5) to a distance of minimum 1 metre to the east of the Pathiyoor-Bhagavathipadi road for obtaining sufficient turning space in the cross road to the petitioners location within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. Still not satisfied with the decision of the CGRF, the appellant filed a petition before this Authority on 26-05-2015. It is concluded that if at all any inconvenience caused to the appellant and other families it is because of the lapses on the part of respondent in adopting proper procedure while implementing Work Deposit Scheme. For taking disciplinary action against the respondent, the appellant is free to approach the authorities of KSEB if so advised. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. |