![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Download details |
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||
The consumer’s Trfr feeding supply to more than 30 independent flats (consumers) failed and the appellant argues it as an omission of KSEB by removing the Lightning Arrestor and demands compensation. Further they request at least 1-phase supply from KSEB T’rfr till a new trfr is procured by them. Dispute. |
|
|||||||||||