Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 363 of 443
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1327
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
Failure to sanction additional load in the premises of the consumer by the respondent - detection of UAL and issuance of penal bill – P/247/2011 – V.D. Vinod, Ernakulam.

Download 
Download
The consumer had applied for addition load in his premises after remitting required fees. There was delay in sanctioning the additional load. Meanwhile APTS conducted inspection and penalized the consumer for availing unauthorised load. Another grievance is that the consumer had applied for TOD tariff after remitting the required fees and the respondent has not raised the bills accordingly from next month onwards. Since the consumer also filed petition before the Hon. High Court for decision on the same issues of reliefs sought from here, it is held that the case is not maintainable before this Forum.
Low voltage problem and failure to comply the decision taken in Vydyuthi Adalath regarding the installation of T’rfr at a location. –P/241/2011 – PrakashV.N., Perumbavoor.

Download 
Download
The appellant alleges that the respondent is reluctant to comply the decisions taken in the Adalath and deviating from the assurance given for installing a transformer. The present Peak voltages at the load end (LT side) as reported by the AEE is found to be less than the permissible limits prescribed by the Rules. Held that the voltage improvement works proposed and approved by the KSEB earlier is found reasonable and the respondent shall execute the same work on priority.
Excess MD charges collected from the consumer – eligible to get refund as per tariff order – P/240/2011 – Reji Varghese, Saj Flights, Thiruvanathapuram.

Download 
Download
As per tariff order dated 27/11/2007, the demand charges of a HT consumer can be raised only for 75% of the agreed contract demand or the recorded Maximum Demand, whichever is higher. The contract demand of the consumer has been reduced w.e.f. 1/2/2008 as per CGRF’s order and hence consumer demands for the refund at least from that date. Held that the case filed before the Hon. High Court is not a bar for releasing the excess MD collected from the consumer during the period from 2/08 to 12/09, since the dispute before High Court pertains to the period of 11/05 to 2/08 only and KSEB does not have case against the requested period.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday1142
mod_vvisit_counterAll6232020