Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 1 of 262
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 784
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format
Files:
P/081/2018 - Dr. Shaheen C., Malappuram

Download 
Download

The appellant approached the respondent for shifting an electric pole situated in his property. Since no action was taken in the matter, the appellant approached the CGRF with the request for shifting the pole from his property to the PWD area, which was disposed of by order dated 23-08-2018 as “(1) The respondent shall shift the electric pole situated in the property of the petitioner to the proposed location under deposit work within the stipulated time. (2) The respondent shall consider the request of the petitioner to shift the pole within his property, subject to the feasibility, so as to reduce the expenditure”. Hence this appeal is against the order dated 23-08-2018 of CGRF, Kozhikode, in the OP 46/2018-19, filed before it. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, I take the following decision. In view of the factual position I don’t find any reason to interfere with the findings and decision taken by the CGRF, Kozhikode in this case and hence the order of CGRF OP No. 46/2018-19 dated 23-08-2018 is upheld. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs.
P/082/2018 - Sri. Joseph A.G,. Ernakulam

Download 
Download

The appellant has filed an appeal petition in P/082/2018, being aggrieved at the inaction of KSEBL, Electrical Section, Palarivattom to shift the electric posts situated in the pathway of the building owned by the appellant to the nearby compound wall. The appellant finds difficulty to free assess of vehicular traffic to his property. Though the appellant had approached the KSEBL for shifting the posts, they had prepared an estimate and remitted the required amounts on 15-03-2017. The appellant has filed petition before the CGRF, Ernakulam vide Petition No. OP No. 16/2018-19 and the CGRF has disposed it by order dated 29-09-2018 as follows: "(1) If the petitioner desires to shift the electric post and line for increasing the front area of the shop and house to feasible route proposed by the respondent, the willingness shall be submitted to the Assistant Engineer office on or before 8-10-2018. (2) 1f the petitioner is not willing to accept the feasible proposal proposed by the respondent, the respondent shall take up the matter with Honourable District Magistrate, Ernakulam as per the provisions of Section 67 and Section 68 of the Act 2003 for solving the issue within one week from the date of receipt of this order". Still aggrieved by the said order, the Appellant has filed the Appeal Petition before this Authority. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, I take the following decision. In view of the factual position I don’t find any reason to interfere with the findings and decision taken by the CGRF, Ernakulam in this case and hence the order of CGRF No. CGRF–CR/Comp.16/2018-19 dated 29-09-2018 is upheld. The respondent shall take a suitable decision regarding the amount collected from the appellant after obtaining an order from the District Magistrate on this issue. The appeal is found devoid of any merits and hence dismissed. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs.
P/069/2018 General Secretary, Ponnani Chamber of Commerce, Malappuram

Download 
Download

The appellant is the General Secretary of the Chamber of Commerce, Ponnani and represents a group of 12 LT industrial consumers under Electrical Section, Ponnani. The Audit team of Regional Audit Officer, Tirur conducted an inspection during the period from 25-09-2017 to 31-10-2017 and found that the consumers were issued with undercharged bills from 1/4/2014 to 31/3/2017. Accordingly the consumers were issued with short assessment bills. Aggrieved by this, the appellant had approached the CGRF (NR) by filing a petition in OP No. 189/2017-18. The Forum analysed that there was a short realization of revenue in both the current charges and OYEC-ECSC charges and directed the respondent to review the short assessment bills for short collection in current charges and OYEC-ECSC charges and to prepare fresh short assessment bills for each consumer. Aggrieved against this, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. From the findings and conclusions arrived at as detailed above, the respondent is directed to limit the period of reassessment and revise the bills of all the consumers except Consumer No. 61 for the period of 24 months prior to the month of 12/2016. There is no revision of period in the case of Consumer No. 61. Having concluded and decided as above it is ordered accordingly. The Appeal Petition filed by the Consumer is allowed as ordered and stands disposed of as such. The order of CGRF in 189/2017-18 dated 09-07-2018 is modified to this extent. No order on costs.

Contact Us

STATE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN,
Charangattu Bhavan,
Building No-36/895,
Mamangalam- Anchumana Road,
Edappally- P O.Kochi 682024, KERALA,
Phone#  +91 484 2346488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday675
mod_vvisit_counterAll592642