Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1327 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/086/2024, Sri.C.P Prabhakumar 
|
|
| The appellant Shri.C.P Prabhakumar is the owner of the Coastal Breeding Farm (Pvt.) Ltd. at Vannamada, Palakkad with Consumer no. 1165020021296. The said connection was taken as a temporary in LT VII A tariff for the construction purpose with connected load 6.89KW in the name of Mr. Ramakrishnan which was connected on 29/04/2013. Later the connection was changed with the appellant, as 3 phase LT, with connected load 44.459 KW with contract demand of 20 KWA. The tariff applied was changed from LT 7A to LT 4A as per the request of the consumer on 10/01/2014. The appellant was running a duck hatchery and produce day old duckling and selling outside. The certificate issued by the District Industries Centre states that the industry is Hatchery. The Licensee issued by Eruthempathy Panchayath as well as in Kerala State Pollution Control Board also states that the unit is Hatching the Duck egg and produces daily one ducklings. The Licensee had applied the tariff LT IV A, and latter changed into LT V B based on the request of the consumer and conducting inspection on 06/08/2023. The allegation of the appellant is that the Licensee would have applied the tariff since 10/01/2014. Itself, Or would have changed by the Licensee on suo motto as per regulation 97 of the Supply Code, 2014. The appellant had filed the petition to the CGRF and CGRF in order on completing the procedures on 11.11.2024. The Aggrieved the appellant had filed this petition as appeal to the order of CGRF. |
| P/01/2025,Sri. Denny Simon
|
|
| The appellant Shri. Denny Simon is a domestic consumer with Consumer no.1156565001346 and with connected load 8.426 KW. The appellant had applied for solar connection on 02/03/2024 and the solar plant was commissioned on 12/04/2024. When the solar plant was connected the billing pattern has been changed to the monthly billing from the previous bimonthly billing. The date of last reading was 04/04/2024 which was before solar panel connection. The period from 04/04/2024 to 12/04/2024 was the non solar period consumption. The next bill issued on 02/05/2024 in which 04/04/2024 to 12/04/2024 is the non solar period and for the period from 12/04/2024 to 02/05/2024 was the solar period. The bill so issued amounts to Rs. 550.70/- for solar period at Rs. 207.28 for the solar period totaling to Rs.758/-. The reading for a period from 04/04/2024 to 12/04/2024 was 68 units. 68 units were consumed for 8 days then the monthly consumption was arrived and this exceeds 250 units and accordingly the flat rate tariff @ Rs. 6.4/- per unit was applied. The appellant challenged this method of calculation. His argument is the total consumption was only 68 units and the tariff applied should be telescopic tariff applicable to 68 units. The appellant filed the petition to CGRF and CGRF issued order on 03/12/2024.Aggrieved with the order of the CGRF, the appellant had filed this appeal petition to this Authority. |
| P/02/2025,Sri.Ajayakumar.V,R
|
|
| The appellant Shri. Ajayakumar. V.R is the owner of the M/s. Lakshmi Stone Industries. The HT service connection was availed for the running this stone crushing unit. The unit was functioned during the covid period and there was no consumption from 11/2022 to 06/2024. The power availed on 15/06/2010 and agreement executed for this on 15/06/2010. The service connection was disconnected due to default in payment on 22/10/2022 due t o default in payment since 12/2021. The dismantling notice was issued on 27/06/2023. The crusher unit was inoperative during the covid 19 pandemic period due to lock down. The Licensee had issued a demand of Rs. 20,33,031/-. The petition defaulted payment. The total arrears during disconnection was Rs.65,89,440/- even after disconnection the Licensee demanded Fixed charges @ Rs. 1,52,100/-. Aggrieved with the wrong demand, the appellant approached Hon’ble High Court of Kerala, and got an interim order to pay Rs.15 lakh and reconnect the power. The payment was made a 16/06/2024, the Licensee has not reconnected the power in time and reconnected only on 23/07/2024. The petitioner argue that the illegal demand are to be withdrawn. The appellant filed petition to CGRF and CGRF issued order on 30/12/2024. This petition is filed as the appeal to the Order of CGRF. |