KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P-084-2022-Sri.Shamsudeen, Malappuram-Order 30-12-22 
|
|
| As the CT in 150/5 ratio, the Licensee has mistakenly billed the power charge as per MF-20 instead of MF-30. On inspection, this mistake was found out and prepared a site mahazar. Accordingly, the Licensee has issued a short assessment bill to the appellant. Appellant approached CGRF-NR and the Forum ordered that the appellant is liable to remit the short assessment bill amount in instalments without interest. Further, appeal petition submitted to the Authority and the decision as follows: 1) Uphold the decision of CGRF-NR. 2) Officials of the Licensee has made serious mistake and as such necessary action is to be taken against the concerned officials. |
| P-082-2022-Smt. Leena Varghese, Thrissur-Order 29-12-22
|
|
| Electric connection was not provided by the Licensee in absence of the ownership certificate. Uphold the decision of CGRF. |
| P-085-2022-Sri. Abdul Hameed, Malappuram-Order 28-12-22
|
|
| There are three service connections in the same premises (1) consumer No. 1167097000417 is for Arabic College (2) No. 1167097022009 is for “Niskarappalli” and (3) No. 1167097022102 is for water pump connection. The service connection 1167097000417 is billed under tariff VI F being a private unaided Self-Financing Educational Institution. The connection as per the agreement is 35 kW and the appellant added more load and it is now 65.107 kW. A demand note was raised to the appellant by the Licensee for Rs.4,54,990/- as the arrear bill for a period from 12/2007 to 09/2014 in accordance with the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in civil appeal No. 8350/2009 dated 20-02-2020 in connection with the tariff dispute of Self-Financing Educational Institutions. Challenging this demand, appellant filed petition to CGRF (NR) and CGRF (NR) issued order stating that the appellant is liable to pay the demand raised by the Licensee. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF(NR), the appellant filed the appeal petition to this Authority and the decision is taken as follows: 1) Agree with the order vide OP No.15/2022-23 dated 22.9.2022 of Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (NR). |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 1818 |
 | All | 4870844 |