KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P-065-2022-Sri. Narayanan Sasi, TVM-Order 22-11-22 
|
|
| The power supply to the appellant’s home was got disconnected. There was over voltage in the system. The connection resumed only on next day at 5 PM. Due to the over voltage, some of the home appliances damaged. The loss suffered is to be compensated. The appellant filed the petition to CGRF (SR) and CGRF (SR) vide order dated 29-07-2022, the claim for the compensation has been disallowed. The appellant approached this Authority by filing the appeal petition And this Authority agreed with the order of CGRF. However, Licensee has to ensure the proper quality of the power supplied to the consumers. |
| P-064-2022- Sri. Kiran Balu. U.V., Kozhikode-Order 17-11-22
|
|
| Shri. Babu, who is a resident of ward 10 of Chelannur Panchayath has given consent to build an open public well in his land. The claim is that the land belongs to him and he is remitting tax for this property and KSEBL has drawn the line crossing the property without consent. The appellant approached CGRF(NR) and CGRF (NR) ordered that CGRF(NR) is agreed with the order issued by the ADM. The appellant filed appeal petition before this Authority and this Authority agreed with the order of CGRF(NR) in order No. OP-91/2021-22 dated 29-06-2022. |
| P-062-2022-Sri. Nevin. T. Jacob, Ernakulam-Order 16-11-22
|
|
| The appellant had received a short assessment bill for Rs.19,300/- as per RAO audit vide invoice dated 20-03-2020. This is the difference of fixed charge for the period from 22-06-2016 to 20-03-2019. The residential building was occupied by rented party for accommodating their employees. The rented party has vacated settling the dues. This short assessment has come due to the wrongly changing the tariff from LT 1A to LT 7A by the Suo moto action of KSEBL. The appellant approached the CGRF(CR) and the order of CGRF (CR) sates that the petitioner is liable to pay the short assessment bill issued by the Licensee. The appellant filed the appeal petition before this Authority and following decisions are taken: 1. The order of CGRF (Central Region) is set aside. 2. The tariff change applied is not legal and hence, not sustainable. 3. Short assessment, if any, as per tariff LT 1A if applicable is to be reworked and appellant is liable to pay only this amount. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 2211 |
 | All | 4871236 |