KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/002/2019 Sri. Krishnakumar C. P. Kozhikode 
|
|
| The appellant has filed an appeal petition in P/002/2019, being aggrieved at the inaction of KSEBL, Electrical Section, Kovoor to shift the electric pole situated in the existing location to the pathway. The appellant finds difficulty to construct a building in his property. Though the appellant had approached the KSEBL for shifting the posts, they had prepared an estimate for Rs. 8,504/-+ GST and directed to remit the amount for shifting. The appellant is not willing to remit amount and he has filed petition before the CGRF, Kozhikode vide Petition No. OP No. 84/2018-19. The CGRF dismissed the petition vide order dated 13-11-2018. Still aggrieved by the said order, the Appellant has filed the Appeal Petition before this Authority. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, the appellant’s plea to waive the labour is rejected and this Authority upheld the decision taken by the CGRF in OP No.84/2018-19 dated 13-11-2018. The appeal is found devoid of any merits and hence dismissed. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs. |
| REVIEW PETITION No. 01/2019 IN APPEAL PETITION NO. P/081/2018 Dr. Shaheen C. Malappuram
|
|
| The review appellant approached the respondent for shifting an electric pole situated in his property. Since no action was taken in the matter, the appellant approached the CGRF with the request for shifting the pole from his property to the PWD area, which was disposed of by order dated 23-08-2018 as “(1) The respondent shall shift the electric pole situated in the property of the review petitioner to the proposed location under deposit work within the stipulated time. (2) The respondent shall consider the request of the review petitioner to shift the pole within his property, subject to the feasibility, so as to reduce the expenditureâ€. Not satisfied with the decision of CGRF, the review petitioner has filed appeal against the order of CGRF, Kozhikode, before this Authority which was dismissed by upholding the decision of the CGRF, vide order No. P/081/2018 dated17-12-2018 of this Authority. Still aggrieved by the decision, the review appellant has submitted this review petition with a plea to review the orders and to allow the reliefs sought for. The request of the review appellant is to minimize the amount made under Deposit Work by avoiding the insertion of pole in the existing line. As per respondent the insertion of pole cannot be avoided as the line can only be shifted by drawing the line from the pole to be inserted, otherwise there will not be vertical clearance. No glaring mistake or apparent errors on the face of record, on the order dated 17-12--2018 of this Authority, in Appeal Petition No. P/081/2018, were pointed out by the review appellant here. In the review petition nothing is pointed out which escaped the notice of this Authority while disposing the appeal petition. The review jurisdiction is limited to rectify a mistake or an error which is apparent on the face of records and it cannot be used as appellate jurisdiction. In view of the above discussions, I hold that review petition is not maintainable as this Authority didn’t find any reason to intervene the order already issued. Hence the review petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. |
| P/091/2018 Smt. Pennamma Varghese Alappuzha
|
|
| The appellant having the domestic service connection bearing consumer number 1501 under Electrical Section, Kuthiathode had filed a complaint before the CGRF, Ernakulam requesting to shift the electric line drawn near to the roof of her residence which was shifted from the neighbour’s property recently by the respondent. The CGRF, Ernakulam, dismissed the petition vide order No. 51/2018 dated 22-12-2018, as it is found that the existing two line cross arm in the electric post is replaced by four line cross arm and at present the horizontal and vertical clearance from the residence building is as per existing rules and regulations. Aggrieved by the order of the CGRF, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Forum. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, the appeal Petition No. P/091/2018 filed by the appellant stands dismissed as it is found not maintainable before this Authority. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 4431 |
 | All | 4878421 |