KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/017/2018 - Sri. John Daniel,, Kollam 
|
|
| The appellant is a consumer bearing consumer No.2984 under Electric Section, Ayoor, Kollam. The consumer is aggrieved by the fact that the service wire, giving connection to his neighbor, Smt. Rajani (Con: No.381) was drawn across his property without his consent. The appellant filed a petition before the CGRF, Kottarakkara, vide OP No. 556/2017 as he was not fully satisfied with the action of the respondent. The Forum disposed of the petition on 20-02-2018 by directing the appellant to approach the District Collector since the dispute relates to property crossing and the Forum has no jurisdiction to entertain such disputes. Aggrieved by this decision, the appellant has submitted this Appeal petition before this Authority on 19/03/2018. The respondent is ordered to prepare an estimate to shift the line from the property of the appellant, as stated above or by any other feasible route or method of shifting, whichever is most convenient and that causes without obstruction to others and to proceed with further actions as per rules with in 60 (sixty) days of this order. The respondent shall collect deposit work amount from the appellant for the shifting of Line and carry out the work as per the estimate. If the grievance is not redressed as above, the appellant can approach the District Magistrate for further remedies. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. The Appeal Petition filed by the appellant, Sri. John Daniel, stands disposed of as above. No order on costs. |
| P/020/2018 - Sri. Sifi Thomas, Palakkad
|
|
| The appellant is a consumer under Electrical Section, Kanjikode and the said connection No.18403 was provided w.e.f. 09-01-2014. The purpose for which is the connection is being used for Carbon dioxide bottling. From the very beginning of the firm, the KSEB started billing the consumer under LT VI F tariff. After 3 years, the tariff was converted into LT VII A. The appellant’s request to change the tariff, to LT 4A was not considered by KSEB, in spite of complaint submitted by him. Being aggrieved by this action of KSEBL, the appellant filed a complaint before the CGRF, Kozhikode vide OP No. 128/2017-18, and the same was disposed of by disallowing the petition, on 30-01-2018. Aggrieved by the said order of CGRF, the appellant has filed the appeal Petition, before this Authority. In view of the factual position I don’t find any reason to interfere with the findings and decision taken by the CGRF, Kozhikode in this case and hence the order of CGRF is upheld. The appeal is found devoid of any merits and hence dismissed. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs. |
| P/016/2018 - Sri Ayyappan Nair.C.K.,, Thiruvananthapuram
|
|
| The appellant has filed the appeal petition, being aggrieved at the inaction of KSEBL to shift the transformer erected in front of his property situated under Electrical Section, Parassala in Thiruvananthapuram District. The appellant alleges that the said transformer was installed without informing him. The appellant owns about 12¼ cents of land and due to the installation of transformer, he finds difficulty to construct a house in his property because it will cause inconvenience to enter the property. Though the appellant had approached the ministers and various officers of KSEBL for shifting the transformer, his grievance is not yet settled. Since no proper action was taken on his petitions, the appellant has filed petition before the CGRF, Kottarakkara vide Petition No. OP No. 558/2017 and the CGRF has dismissed it by order dated 14-02-2018, due to lack of merit. Still aggrieved by the said order, the appellant has filed the Appeal Petition, before this Authority. In view of the above discussions, the respondent is directed to consider shifting of the transformer in a convenient location at the time of widening the road, if technically feasible. If the widening work is delayed more, the shifting shall be arranged under deposit work, if technically feasible and a convenient location than the present. The order of CGRF, Kottarakkara vide Petition No. OP 558/2017 dated 14-02-2018 is set aside. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 512 |
 | All | 4879281 |