KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/134/2017 - Sri. K.M. Abdulkhader 
|
|
| The APTS Unit of Kozhikode conducted an inspection in the premises on 19-04-2017 and found that the 'R' phase and 'Y' phase voltage terminals were seen connected interchanged. Accordingly, the appellant was served with a provisional short assessment bill, assessing for a period of 24 months, when the meter was found recording less than the actual, so as to recover the unrecorded portion of energy, for Rs. 400606/-. The respondent is directed to revise the bills for the consumption for the period of 24 months prior to the inspection by taking an average consumption for the months of 05/2017, 06/2017 and 07/2017, i.e 3041 units. |
| P/129/2017 - Sri. Thulaseedharan B
|
|
| the appellant was aggrieved with the exorbitant bill issued for the month of 06/2017, issued by the respondent on 03/07/2017 for Rs.2797/-. The appellant lodged complaint before the CGRF, Kottarakkara on 19-07-2017. It was requested to waive off the excess charges levied in the bill of Rs. 2797/-. 1. The request of the appellant to quash the bill for 25 units is granted. 2. The respondent shall test the meter in an approved laboratory complying with the provision under Regulation 115 (5) of Supply Code, 2014 and convince him the test result. 3. If the meter is faulty, the appellant shall be exempted from paying the bill for 447 units and if the meter is good, the appellant shall remit the bill amount. No surcharge is payable by the appellant. |
| P/112/2017-Sri. Givindraj C & Others
|
|
| The appellants approached the CGRF with a petition requesting to shift the double circuit 33 kV electric line passing through their agricultural fields by taking appropriate to shift the line through a feasible route so as to avoid further inconvenience to the appellants. the order of CGRF deserve merit, as the shifting of the line is not technically feasible.reliefs sought by the appellants are also found not admissible the CGRF order in OP No. 03/2017-18 dated 31-07-2017 is upheld Authority. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 477 |
 | All | 4879246 |