KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 Withdrawal of the concession tariff (industrial) granted to hotels and reclassification under LT commercial category- Dispute on arrears- - P/295/2012 – Hotel Indraprastha, Palakkad. 
|
|
| Based on a govt. policy to promote tourism in Kerala, electricity tariff of those hotels who got approval, including the appellant, was assigned industrial tariff. Later, govt. withdrew the concession and reclassified to LT commercial category. The affected consumers including the appellant challenged the govt. order before Hon. Supreme Court. The Hon Supreme court decided that the govt. order, restricting concession will have only prospective operation. The KSEB issued notice to the appellant demanding payment of arrears, pertaining to the differential electricity charges very late. The consumer challenged it. |
| Review Petition-Excess amount collected than the actual expenditure incurred by KSEB to provide supply to a high rise building of the consumer – Review Petition P/2052011 – Biju M Nizam,
|
|
| The consumer had applied for 11 KV supply with LT service connections for various independent units in his building and remitted the amount under cost estimate scheme for the work, as directed by KSEB. The consumer alleges that the actual amount of expenditure incurred was not revealed to him in spite of his requests and not refunded the excess amount collected from him. The appeal petition disposed by this Forum and still not satisfied the decision taken by this Forum, this Review petition filed. |
| Review Petition- Excess amount collected than the actual expenditure incurred by KSEB to provide supply to the consumer – Review Petition P/207/2011, AbrahamJoseph, Tvm.
|
|
| The consumer had applied for new electric connections to his building and remitted the amount under OYEC scheme. The consumer complaints no special devices like RMU or Add-on-Module were installed in the line of supply, even though the required amount collected from him. Since the new device was not installed, the consumer had requested to refund the excess amount collected from him. Against the order pronounced by this Forum, this Review petition filed. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 1266 |
 | All | 4872585 |