KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P/045/2014 - Thoppumpady, Kochi-682 005 
|
|
| The appellant is an industrial consumer with consumer No. 11343 under Electrical Section, Thoppumpady with registered connected load of 38 kW. On 06/02/2014 the APTS wing of KSEB inspected the premises and found that Y phase voltage display in the meter was very low. On a detailed checking with a standard energy meter it was found that the reading obtained was only 52.9% of the actual loading. Analysing the previous consumption a sudden dip was noticed from 07/2013. As per the above findings the Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, Thoppumpady issued a short assessment bill for the period from 07/2013 to 01/2014 amounting to Rs. 1,93,575 on 12/02/2014. Aggrieved against the bill, the appellant approached CGRF with complaint No. 234/2013-14 on 17/07/2014. The CGRF disposed that complaint on 17/02/2014 directing the respondent to revise the short assessment bill after excluding the consumption for the month of 07/2013. Aggrieved against that decision, the appellant filed this appeal. The order of CGRF is upheld. |
| P/069/2014 - Sri Sabu K. Kuriakose, Ernakulam
|
|
| According to the appellant, one Sri V.K. Poulose has been misusing the agricultural connection allotted to late Sri David Kuriakose (Consumer No. 257) under Electrical Section, Muvattupuzha No. II. The appellant had taken up the matter with KSEB officials before approaching the CGRF. The appellant alleged that the agricultural subsidy had illegally been enjoyed by Sri V.K. Poulose for the last 15 years, after the death of his father, Sri David Kuriakose. According to the respondent, ownership of agricultural connection in the present case was not changed due to the non submission of necessary application. The appellant was not present for hearing before the CGRF. The CGRF found that the matter did not come under the jurisdiction of the Forum. Aggrieved against the order, this appeal petition was filed. The appellant has no Locus Standi to file this appeal. Hence dismissed. CGRF order is upheld. |
| NO.P/071/2014 - Sri. K.V. Francis, Kalady
|
|
| The appellant is the Managing Partner of M/s Kalpana Agro Mills bearing consumer No. 11308 under Electrical Section, Kalady. He applied for additional load enhancement of existing LT connection by converting the same to HT connection on 13-06-2011. According to the appellant, he submitted the agreement on 30-10-2013. But the same was executed only on 11-02-2014 and the HT connection was effected on 12-02-2014. Meanwhile a total amount of Rs. 4,95,000/- was collected from the appellant towards the Unconnected Minimum Charges for the period from 20-01-2013 to 30-10-2013. The appellant approached the CGRF on 15-05-2014 praying to set aside the UCM charges. The Forum, in its order, directed the respondents to revise the UCM charges by limiting the period of assessment for 9 months and to adjust the excess amount paid in future bills. Aggrieved against the said order, this appeal petition was filed. The respondents are directed to refund an amount of Rs. 4,95,000/- collected towards the UCM charges from the appellant. Order of CGRF set aside. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 138 |
 | All | 4874128 |