Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 251 of 422
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1265
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/043/2016 Smt. Anita Poulose, Ernakulam.

Download 
Download
The appellant, Smt. Anita Poulose, had purchased a property with a service connection having consumer No. 4661 under Electrical Section, Parakkadavu. The above mentioned service connection was registered in favour of one Mr. Sreekumar. O., Edappally, Moozhikulam, Kurumassery P.O. The appellant and her husband are the present occupants of the property and were paying electricity charges up to 09/2014. Since the appellant failed to remit the electricity charges for the month of 11/2014 the respondent disconnected the supply on 18-12-2014 and later dismantled on 17-04-2015. The appellant alleged that the service connection was disconnected and later dismantled by the respondent without any notice. Hence the appellant requested for restoration of supply, but the respondent denied the request and directed to take a new service connection. Aggrieved against the non restoration of supply, the appellant filed a petition before the CGRF which was disposed in favour of respondent. Not satisfied with the decision of CGRF, the appellant has filed the appeal petition If the appellant desires to have a service connection to her premises she can apply for the same as a fresh applicant after complying with the formalities required. If the appellant is making such an application then the respondent is directed to issue a new service connection to the appellant after observing the formalities without any delay. The order of CGRF-CR/Comp/7/2016-17/101 dated 02-06-2016 is upheld. No order as to costs.
P/037/2016 Smt. Annie Jose, Thrissur.

Download 
Download
The appellant, Smt. Annie Jose, is an industrial consumer having consumer number 2507 under Electrical Section, Parappukara. The appellant was issued a short assessment bill amounting to Rs. 2,26,410.00 for the period from 10/2013 to 11/2014 based on the audit report of the Regional Audit Officer, Irinjalakkuda, alleging that the contract demand of the appellant has exceeded 100 kVA. One time relaxation was given to consumers genuinely requiring a contract demand exceeding 100 kVA for continuing under LT connection, subject to the condition that contract demand declared shall not exceed the present connected load, i.e. load based on which billing was done during November 2012 and that such consumer had connected load above 100 kVA prior to implementation of Supply Code, 2015. The appellant’s registered contract demand was 112 kVA. In the audit it was found that the recorded maximum demand of the appellant during the month of 10/2013 was 113 kVA. Since the eligibility of one time relaxation was lost, the appellant was billed under High Tension category and accordingly the short assessment bill issued. Aggrieved against the bill, the appellant filed petition before the CGRF, Ernakulam vide Petition No. 143/2015-16. The Forum vide order dated 10-05-2016, directed the respondent to limit the period of assessment for 24 months. Not satisfied with the decision of CGRF, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In the above circumstances it is decided to quash the short assessment bill issued for Rs. 1,68,431.00. The respondent is directed to issue revised bill treating the appellant as deemed HT consumer with effect from 06/2014 onwards based on the Schedule of Tariff and Terms and Conditions issued by KSERC. The order of CGRF-CR/Comp/143/2015-16/73 dated 10-05-2016 is hereby set aside. No order as to costs.
P/033/2016 M/s Akay Spices (P) Ltd Mudakuzha P.O., Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant, M/s Akay Spices (P) Ltd., is a HT consumer having a contract demand of 750 kVA with consumer Code: 1355900030861 under the jurisdiction of Electrical Section, Koovappady. The appellant has submitted a request before the Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, Koovappady for his urgent intervention to redress grievances of the appellant regarding frequent supply interruption in the feeder concerned. Aggrieved against the inaction of the respondent in the matter, the appellant filed petition before the CGRF, Ernakulam vide Petition No. 74/2015-16. The Forum vide order dated 08-02-2016, disposed the petition with a direction to the respondent “to maintain the supply with the least possible interruption”. Not satisfied with the decision of CGRF, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In the result, the respondent is directed to provide a separate feeder to the appellant if the appellant is willing to meet the expenses for the same. Needless to say that in the meanwhile the respondent shall take all necessary steps to avoid interruptions in the power supply given to the appellant. The order of the CGRF-CR/Comp/74/2015-16/606 dated 08-02-2016 is upheld. No order as to costs.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday2939
mod_vvisit_counterAll5041049