Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 4 of 409
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1226
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
RP/01/2024-Sri. Markose Xavier


P/036/2023- Sri. Paul Robson


The appellant Sri. Paul Robson was the registered consumer with number 1155406010243 under college Electrical Section. This connection was in LT IV A tariff. The appellant was not made the power charges since December 2021 as the payment was defaulted the licensee has disconnected the power according to the regulation of Kerala Electricity Supply Code 2014. The licensee could not locate the consumer and hence the notice for the disconnection was not served. The premises was on lease from Mr. Krishnamoorthi and the lease deed signed during 2008 and then the deed was neither renewed nor extended. At present the appellant is not the legal tenant of the premises. The owner submitted application for dismantling the power connection and the licensee has disconnected the power connection. Now the appellant approached the licensee for the reconnection of the power. The section office has asked to produce the legal document showing the occupancy of the premises and the appellant could not produce the same and hence the power was not connected. Aggrieved consumer approached the CGRF and CGRF order dated 23/06/2023 states that the CGRF is not to intervene in the case as the case is pending before the Hon’ble Rent Control Court, EKM. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF this appeal petition was filed to this authority.
P/061/2023- Shri. Babu C George


The appellant is a consumer of the licensee (KSEBL) under Thrikkakkara Electrical Section. The appellant applied for the power supply to their new project BCG Residency opposite CEZ at Seaport Airport Road, Kakkanad, Ernakulam on 13/01/2013. The requirment of the power of the appellant was 900kVA along with three other applicant. The 11 kV line has to be drawn for a length of 1.8 km from the 66 kv substation, Kakkanad in which 1.65 km is a new line and 140 m of line duplication. The appellant has paid the proportional contribution for the work of Rs. 2,41,935/- The licensee has completed the works on 30/04/2013 and issued notice on 28/06/2013, to avail the power supply by 30/06/2013, if not the unconnected minimum charges will be levied at the rate of Rs.54,900/- per month. The appellant could avail the power supply as on 28/06/2015. As per the supply code 2005 regulation 10(1), the appellant is liable to pay the UCM charges. The supply code was revised and the same was come into force with effect from 01/04/2014, the UCM charges are not applicable as per the new supply code. Hence, the licensee charged the UCM charges from 01/07/2013 to 31/03/2014 (i.e., for 9 months) for Rs. 4,94,100/- The appellant contented this demand notice stating that this is not chargeable as per the Electricity Act 2003. They file petition to CGRF and CGRF issued order dated 18/10/2023 stating that the appellant is liable to pay the UCM charges for six months. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, this petition is filed to this authority.

Contact Us

D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter