Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 286 of 422
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1265
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/117/2015 - Sri Madhusoodhanan Pillai, Keerikkadu

Download 
Download
The appellant and the members of 12 other families residing in the location had raised complaint regarding the obstruction for the free conveyance due to the existence of two electric posts on their private road. On 10-10-2014, Sri Chandran Pillai, a complainant, (Consumer no.4637) had submitted an application at Electrical Section, Kayamkulam West for shifting the above electric posts for the smooth running of vehicles through the road. Accordingly the respondent had prepared an estimate for carrying out the work and the same was done on 24-11-2014. According to the appellant, the work was not executed as requested by them and they were not satisfied with the action of the respondent. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Central Region, Ernakulam by filing a petition on 04-02-15. The CGRF admitted the petition and issued an order dated 29-04-2015 directing the respondents to shift the post (KYB/BP/5) to a distance of minimum 1 metre to the east of the Pathiyoor-Bhagavathipadi road for obtaining sufficient turning space in the cross road to the petitioners location within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. Still not satisfied with the decision of the CGRF, the appellant filed a petition before this Authority on 26-05-2015. It is concluded that if at all any inconvenience caused to the appellant and other families it is because of the lapses on the part of respondent in adopting proper procedure while implementing Work Deposit Scheme. For taking disciplinary action against the respondent, the appellant is free to approach the authorities of KSEB if so advised. Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
P/116/2015 - Smt. Jaseentha Lazar, Kollam

Download 
Download
The appellant’s grievance in this appeal petition is that on 13/12/2014 her neighbor Sri, Baiju trespassed into her property, drawn electric line and installed tube lights from the Baiju’s electric connection. The appellant had submitted a complaint before the respondent for removing the tube lights since the extension of supply from Baiju’s connection and lights were installed in her property without her consent. It is alleged that the respondent had not taken any action on her complaint in time. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Kottarakkara with a petition in OP No. 1367/2014 which was dismissed due to lack of merits. Against the above Order of the Forum, the appellant filed this appeal. Since the issue has been settled there is no further orders are necessary in the matter. However, the appellant is free to approach appropriate Forum for claiming damages if so advised. Appeal is disposed.
P/118/2015 - The Chief Engineer (E&I), M/s FACT Ltd., Cochin Division, Ambalamedu, Kochi

Download 
Download
The appellant, Sri Abraham Roy Mathew, Chief Engineer (Electrical & Instrumentation), M/s FACT, Cochin Division, representing a Public Sector Unit under Government of India is a consumer under the power distribution licensee, Cochin Port Trust. The appellant has taken possession of fertilizer berth and ammonia berth at Willington Island area of Cochin Port Trust for long lease. The respondent provided with three service connections to the above premises of the appellant with consumer numbers 100000723, 100000729 and 700000730 having a contract demand of 900 kVA, 312 kVA and 725 kVA respectively under HT IV commercial tariff. The appellant has requested to provide HT I A industrial tariff to the above consumer numbers 100000723 and 100000730 which was denied by the licensee. The grievance of the appellant is against the wrong and incorrect fixation of tariff by the under HT lV Commercial tariff it is alleged that the appellant is eligible to get a classification under HT-1 A Industrial tariff. Aggrieved by this, the appellant filed a petition before the CGRF, Cochin Port Trust which was disposed vide Order No. 04/2014 dated 05-05-2015, directing (a) Since the Petitioner seeking relief for re-categorization of tariff from HT-IV to HT- 1 from Financial Year 2015-16 onwards, the petitioner may represent the matter before the Hon’ble KSERC during the public hearing scheduled prior to the finalization of Retail Supply Tariff for FY 2015-16, which would be made applicable from 01-10-2015 2 (b) the respondent shall revise the revenue from sale of power based on the decision of KSERC on the above issue and submit to the KSERC for arriving at a reasonable BST applicable to the respondent accordingly.” Challenging the decision of the CGRF, the appellant approached this Authority by filing this appeal petition. The findings of the CGRF of the licensee is not in order and hence set aside. The respondent is hereby directed to re-categorize the appellant's tariff as HT 1 A at any rate within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Appeal is allowed.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday1000
mod_vvisit_counterAll5042312