Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 13 of 410
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Ascending]
Orders Files: 1228
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
The consumer paid the penal charges for the UAL availed and continued to pay the penal charges regularly. When the arrear bill issued including the energy charges, dispute- P/ 287/ 2012- Sheeda Dharmasselan-Varkala.

Download 
Download
Originally the penal charges for the UAL connected, contained only penalty on the Fixed charges portion, which was low compared to the energy charges. The consumer used to pay the penal charges for the UAL connected and did not bother either to remove it or regularise it subsequently, but opted to enjoy it knowingly or unknowingly. The consumer was issued an arrear bill including the proportionate energy charges, (which came into effect from 15.6.2007), which is the cause of the dispute because of the huge amount involved.
The consumer enhanced load and the Meter was changed to a CT operated meter but the M F was wrongly entered as 20 instead of 40. An arrear bill issued - Dispute-P/275/2012-Smt. Beena Justin, Thodupuzha.

Download 
Download
The consumer has enhanced her load necessitating a CT operated Meter, with CT’s having the ratio of 200/5A. The respondent fixed the multiplication factor wrongly as 20 instead of 40 by omission. The APTS detected the mistake and the AE issued an arrear bill assessing for the back period which is disputed by the appellant, under Sec. 56(2) of IE Act, 2003.
The consumer demands the ownership of the service line constructed and the Cable laid on collecting the estimated cost from him. The same Cable used for providing power to the near by applicant at reduced estimate cost is the cause of dispute. Case No. P/

Download 
Download
The consumer has remitted the estimated amount for constructing a separate feeder from the Sub-station by laying 3 x 300 sq.mm cable and accessories for meeting a power demand of around 3000 KVA, to his Multi storied Flat complex under OYEC scheme. The dispute arose when KSEB accorded sanction to a 2nd applicant for giving power from the same Cable laid for the appellant. After giving power to the appellant, the Cable had surplus capacity and the next applicant, with a Power demand for above 1000 KVA, was required to pay less, for tapping power from the cable. The 2nd entrant was thus benefitted. The appellant argues that he needs power for his second stage expansion project. The consumer demands the ownership of the service line constructed and the Cable laid on collecting the estimated cost from him under OYEC scheme.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday2405
mod_vvisit_counterAll4718628