KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Downloads - Orders
Downloads
 Overview |
 Search Downloads |
 Submit file |
 Up |
| Category: Orders | ||
 Orders |
Files: 1245 | |
| Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
||
Files:
 P-095-2022-Sri. Mathew Joseph, Pathanamthitta-Order 03-02-23 
|
|
| The appellant requested Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, Mallappally to shift two stay wires in the front courtyard of his house during February 2022. The stay wires of an 11 kV electric post in front of his house is very unsafe and hampering the ease of movement in the courtyard. One feasible way is to shift the existing 11 kV cut pole to the new location and provide one stay and one fly stay to the pole. Another feasible opinion is coverting the 11 kV pole into A type pole. The first option costs around Rs.24,443/- and second option costs about Rs.43,671/-. The existing stay wires were installed in the appellant’s property without obtaining consent from the appellant. The appellant contented the cost estimate and want to be executed by KSEB free of cost as these were erected without his consent or reduce the cost. The appellant approached the CGRF-SR and filed petition and CGRF(SR) issued order dated 25-11-2022, which states that the respondent has to execute the work, on work deposit basis and appellant has to select one of the options and the payment is to be made. The appellant approached this Authority by filing the appeal petition and following decisions are hereby taken: 1. The Licensee shall execute the shifting of the two stay wires at 50% of the cost estimated for any of two options opted by the appellant. 2. The officials who is responsible for the delay in taking action is to be identified by the Licensee and take necessary action against them. |
| RP-003-2022- AXE, Ramapuram-Order 02-02-23
|
|
| The review appellant, Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division, Ramapuram, has submitted a review petition against the order of the Ombudsman in the appeal petition No. P-046/2022 dated 05-09-2022. The order of Ombudsman is to shift the post & line, which is situated in the land of review respond as per his claim. It is not technically feasible because of the neighbours’ obstruction to install the stay wire for the proposed shifting of the post. It is also stated that at present, the post and line is not making any obstruction to the review respondent. Further, the boundary of the land of the review respondent is not properly earmarked with boundary stone. So, it is not easy in the site to identify the land whether the post is erected belongs to him or not. Only after identifying boundary of the land, the feasibility of shifting the line could be examined. (1) The review respondent Sri. Augustine Thomas has to survey his land and provide boundary stone to demarcate the boundary of the land belongs to him through revenue authorities. (2) The feasibility of shifting of the post and line shall be examined after demarcation of review respondent’s land. |
| P-094-2022- Smt. Sherin J Abraham, Vyttila, Ernakulam-Order 02-02-23
|
|
| The appellant is planning to construct a commercial building in this plot. There is one distribution transformer, which was shifted by the Licensee to the frontage of appellant’s property. The transformer with DP structure is inside a fencing which is situated around 2 M away from the boundary of the land. The request has been sent to Section Office, Chottanikkara for shifting the transformer and no action was taken. Then appellant filed complaint to CGRF, Central Region and CGRF (CR) issued order dated 14-10-2022 stating that the transformer is situated at the most suitable position since 8 years and does not cause any hindrance to the entry and exit of vehicles to this property. The appellant filed appeal petition before this Authority and following decision was taken: The appellant may opt for one of the following options: - 1. The appellant may bear the cost of shifting to the proposed location by the side of the Hill Palace Road provided appellant has to obtain more space to house all these structures and existing structure. 2. The transformer has to be shifted to a plinth inside the property of the appellant for which plinth construction and cost of shifting are to be borne by the appellant. 3. Licensee may execute the shifting as per any one of the options selected by the appellant. |
Contact Us
Any Queries?
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Do you Know?
Consumers should submit petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.
Visitors Counter
 | Today | 1796 |
 | All | 4870822 |