KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Overview | Search Downloads | Submit file | Up |
Category: Orders | ||
Orders | Files: 1280 | |
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
P/046/2024, Shri. Biji Sony |
|
The appellant Shri. Biji Sony is an industrial consumer of the licensee (KSEBL) under their electrical section Ramapuram which is under electrical sub division, Ramapuram. The service connection was with consumer no: 1156292019111 in LT IV AH tariff affected on 08/08/20216. The LT 3 phase connection was with contract demand 93 KvA and connected load 83 Kw. The 3 phase CT meter was connected for this consumer on 02/12/2019 with CT ratio 200/5 and accordingly the multiplication factor was 40. APTS had conducted an inspection on 11/12/2023 at this premises and found that the current in R phase of meter is recording as zero though there was current in the R phase on testing with long tester. The correctness of the meter was tested with a calibrated meter and found that the existing meter is recording 29.75% less than the actual consumption. A short assessment bill for Rs. 68,261/- was issued for a period of one year from 01/2023 to 12/2023. The APTS informed that the R Phase CT was damaged on 28/09/2019. Then the meter and CT were tested in TMR lab of the licensee.Then the short assessment bill was revised for Rs. 2,42,684/- for a period for 12/2019 to 12/2023. The appellant has contented the demand and filed petition to CGRF, CGRF issued order dated 11/06/2024. Aggrieved with the decision of the order of CGRF, this appeal petition was filed. |
P/040/2024/Shri.K.P.Poulose |
|
The appellant Shri. K.P.Poulose is a domestic consumer of the licensee (KSEBL) under the Electrical section, Meenangadi with tariff LT.1A. The appellant was having a domestic connection for his residence and availed another connection under tariff LT 1A for labour shed near to his home. The consumer number is 1165935040166 and connected on 24/03/2023 and the registered connected load is 1087 watts. APTS along with the officials of the electrical section conducted an inspection on 07/02/2024 and found that two connections in the same tariff in same premises is against the regulation. And also seen that nobody is residing this shed instead the power is utilized for charging the Electric Vehicle (EV) of the inmates of the house (main house). This domestic connection was not used for any residential purpose and no laboures were residing this shed. EV charging by availing another domestic connection is the violation of regulation. Accordingly the licensee has issued a demand notice calculating energy charges adding both the consumptions and reducing the amount already paid. This amount worked out to Rs. 12,293/-. The appellant contented the demand and filed the petition to CGRF. CGRF issued order dated 18/05/2024 stating that the appellant is liable to pay the short assessment bill. Aggrieved by the decisions of CGRF, this appeal petition is field to this Authority. |
P/045/2024, Shri. Sabu Johny |
|
he appellant Shri. Sabu Johny the Managing Director of EVM Passenger Cars Pvt Ltd Thiruvalla is a commercial consumer of the Licensee KSEBL.The consumer number is 1146408017269 and connected load was 79 Kw under LT 7 A tariff. The appellant requested the licensee to enhance the connected load to 132 Kw on 16/06/2023 and also opted for demand based tariff with contract demand of 70 KvA. The application fee was remitted on 25/07/2023. On site inspection it is noted that the transformer was overloaded and hence not feasible to enhance the connected load to 132 Kw. The load enhancement could be possible either by installing a separate transformer or enhancing the capacity of the existing transformer. A demand notice has been send to the appellant for Rs.5,12,655/- including the cost of a new 100 KvA transformer for the first option. Another estimate of Rs. 3,18,555/- has also been intimated for enhancing the capacity of the existing transformer. The consumer has been intimated that there is a chance to exceeded the maximum demand than the contracted demand which will overload the system. The appellant approached CGRF and CGRF ordered that the respondent is directed to execute the work after the appellant remitting the estimate amount. Aggrieved with the decision the appellant filed this appeal petition. Subsequent on submission of appeal the appellant submitted the letter stating that the petition is withdrawn as the respondent has complied with the requirement. |
KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Today | 3149 | |
All | 5294045 |
P/055/2024, Shri.Mujeeb.M |
04-11-2024 |
P/054/2024, Shri.Sunil Kumar |
04-11-2024 |
P0/51/2024, Shri. Joy Joseph |
04-11-2024 |
P/049/2024, Sri. Roy Joseph |
04-11-2024 |
P/052/2024, Shri. Sunil Thomas |
04-11-2024 |
P/053/2024, Shri. K.M Raveendran |
04-11-2024 |
P/050/2024, Shri.G.Isaac |
04-11-2024 |
P/048/2024, Shri.David Saj Mathew & Smt. Aparna M.Babu |
04-11-2024 |
P/030/2024, Shri. Dr. Biju Ramesh |
03-10-2024 |
P/046/2024, Shri. Biji Sony |
03-10-2024 |